iPhone 4S dismantled version revealed

iPhone 4S dismantled version revealed

As you all might have known that Apple had recently released the all new iPhone 4S i.e. the successor to iPhone 4. Today here we are going to show you the dismantled version of the iPhone 4S in order to confirm that this new baby contains all the features as promised.

IPhone Dismantled
iPhone Dismantled (Credit: iFixit)

 

iPhone Dismantled Camera

iPhone Dismantled Camera(Credit: iFixit)

iPhone Dismantled Camera Closer
iPhone Dismantled Camera Closer

Camera:

  • CMOS Sensor – Sony
  • Megapixels    – 8MP
  • Aperture        –  f/2.4
  • Video               – 1080 P at 30 fps

Memory:

  • Capacity-512MB DDR2
  • Manufacturer -Samsung, Elpida

Battery:

iPhone 4S is powered by a improved battery which have 0.05 ‘Watt Hours’ more than the previous iPhone means longer power backup.

CPU:

  • Name-A5 Dual Core (Clocked at a frequency less than that of iPad 2)
  • Manufacturer-Samsung

Transceiver:

  • Manufacturer – Qualcomm
  • Model name – RTR8605
  • Can operate at both HSPA and CDMA radio frequencies.

Storage:

  • Manufacturer-Toshiba
  • Technology- NAND FLASH MLC (Multi Level Cell) which is slow as compared to Single Level Cell(SLC)
This article contains content from iFixit, Anandtech and Chipworks

Best broadband plan in India updated october 2011

Best broadband plan in India updated october 2011

Broadband definition in India is still 256Kbps but in order to enjoy the true hd experience on the web on must need atleast 1 Mbps broadband connection. 1 Mbps broadband connection will give you a download speed of around 128 KBps.

Presently in this article i have not considered small ISP’s or local cable walas which can provide you with some lucrative plans. I am considering here three big ISP’s of India i.e. BSNL, Airtel and Reliance Communication. Also here i am considering only the wired broadband plans not the wimax or 3g one’s.

Best broadband plan under Rs. 1000 in India is provided by Reliance Communications under the combo category. Some of the features of this plan are listed below:-

Plan Name – Ace Pack 999

Cost              – Rs. 999/month +tax at 10.3%

Speed          – 1 Mbps down and 512Kbps up

Usage          – Unlimited

Landline    – Available

Call Rate    – 50p/minute Local. No STD

Though Reliance has large coverage area but still it’s availability is limited as compared to Airtel. Also there is one more ISP named Sify which is providing 1 Mbps unlimited at Rs. 898/month but it’s reliability is questionable.

Google purchases Motorola for an impressive 12.5 billion dollar

Google ultimately launches a full scale war on it’s rival Apple Inc. with the purchase of Motorola Mobility Inc. for an impressive 12.5 billion dollar. Google agreed to pay 40$ per share of Motorola. Google will not only gain access various hardware technologies but also to numerous patents. This deal might be the outcome of the failure of Google in acquiring Nortel’s patents

Now here is the main question. Will Google makes the Android OS exclusively for Motorola in the near future? If this happens than this will give rise to many other rivalries in between companies like Samsung, Sony etc. But Larry Page, Google CEO in it’s blog post made it clear that Android will be remained open to all and Motorola will still be operated as a separate business.

BJP.COM acquired by Bhartiya Janta Party of India by filing a UDRP dispute for this domain

BJP.COM acquired by Bhartiya Janta Party of India by filing a UDRP dispute for this domain. BJP is a known political party of India and have the second majority of seats in the Indian parliament. Though this is also true that BJP is not a trademark!

BJP.COM is a 14 year old domain registered in 1997. The political party in question had registered BJP.ORG in 1995.  Both the complainant and respondent are from India.

Here i am discussing the two main points which led this domain to go to the complainant with little or no efort at all.

The first point is that the respondent claimed that he/she had hand registered this particular domain in 1997 for a business purpose but after searching the archives on some of the whois services i have found that this domain had changes hands atleast three times. Now this is the main point which i think the UDRP people must have taken into consideration.

The second pint is that respondent has redirected this domain to the website of the opposition of the political party in question and after this it had become crystal clear that the respondent had registered this domain in bad faith and hence lose the case.